1. Kids don’t know shit about fuck to know what’s actually quality content made for them or is just some absolute garbage that their parents unknowingly purchased and are willing to wade through due to a particular brand being slapped on the game
2. Kids generally are not very skilled at formulating their thoughts and delivering them concisely and coherently.
3. Having kids review videogames can be a fun hobby or can basically turn into unpaid labor depending on how you look at it if IGN “hires” some 7 year old to play Paw Patrol for 3 days straight to push the review out, but that’s neither here nor there I guess I think the first two points are more relevant.
1. Kids don’t know shit about fuck to know what’s actually quality content made for them or is just some absolute garbage that their parents unknowingly purchased and are willing to wade through due to a particular brand being slapped on the game
2. Kids generally are not very skilled at formulating their thoughts and delivering them concisely and coherently.
3. Having kids review videogames can be a fun hobby or can basically turn into unpaid labor depending on how you look at it if IGN “hires” some 7 year old to play Paw Patrol for 3 days straight to push the review out, but that’s neither here nor there I guess I think the first two points are more relevant.
he spent so much time talking about long reviews, that i got bored and closed off.
Thinks adults shouldn’t review sonic the hedgehog and *Crash Bandicoot* and that those are for kids 10 and below…
Solid waste of my time, I’d prefer watching a 4 hour review of a Hanna Montana game.
Who do you think develops kids games?
Totally agree!
we should make games based off weird stuff kids say.
Nonsense. It already starts off by naming games adults like.