[ad_1]
I seen that is getting destroyed by everyone! But when I played I it was really good! Is there something I’m missing?
[ad_2]
View Reddit by Specific-Creme5413 – View Source
[ad_1]
I seen that is getting destroyed by everyone! But when I played I it was really good! Is there something I’m missing?
[ad_2]
View Reddit by Specific-Creme5413 – View Source
Nah, just idiots on Steam review-bombing a very bad game with the same name and accidentally misfiring on a 2011 classic
You probably can’t recognize a good game. Better yet, you probably don’t recognize this game as a cash grab. If you’ve played any COD, pre-black ops, you might have an idea of what you actually missed out on.
It’s the new game MWIII, I hope I don’t get whooshed
Booooo.
Them using the same names over again is ridiculous
Campaign & zombies pretty mid-bad
Multiplayer is actually pretty fun minus that god damn grenade launcher 😅
I think people misread the MW3(2011) as MWIII(2023). Naming confusion.
is this what everyone call irony?
So here is my take: the campaign is taking a lot of heat for being short and the open missions. And my take after playing that part, is that I LOVE the open missions, even if the game reporters don’t.
Zombies is a ton of fun, however, getting forced out after 60 min feels a little short. And it’s tough to complete the missions because everyone on your team is trying to do their own thing.
The new multiplayer: here is where I am EXTREMELY disappointed. The new multiplayer feels clunky I guess. It looks like they just reskinned BO2. And revived the old engine rather than make a new game. Running and ginning doesn’t feel as good, so I tend to camp more which takes the fun out of the game for me.
Still worth the price to play it, but I won’t be playing the multiplayer at all. I will just play zombies and Warzone at this point.
Everything !! We don’t like change from the old ones