[ad_1]
Is Kevin Costner’s child really that ugly?
[ad_2]
View Reddit by Cheeseflaps1234 – View Source
[ad_1]
Is Kevin Costner’s child really that ugly?
[ad_2]
View Reddit by Cheeseflaps1234 – View Source
That headline is mean. Why are they calling his kid ugly?
Poor kids. They are going to be struggling to survive now when they are with mom.
> wins ‘ugly child’ support battle
> wins ugly ‘child support battle’
Ugly child support only half of good-looking child support is the real headline.
ONLY 63000 a month? How will she ever survive
if he has an ugly child did he really win?
Imagine getting $63,000 per month for doing absolutely nothing and complaining about it.
Costner was initially ordered to pay $130K/month in child support. Ex petitioned to increase that to $180K and court brought it down to $63K.
Why are ugly children so expensive?
So what’s the difference in the care needed for the kids of a movie star and the kids of a regular Joe? . Surely it can’t be 62,000 a month more just because they are celebrity kids.
More than i earn in a year. And i have to work for it … life sucks so hard.
Imagine having to survive on ONLY $63k PER MONTH!!!!! That’s like the poverty line, right?
Fuck the courts, fuck this women, and fuck anyone else who supports this insane level of support. That’s not child support that’s extortion. Median income in the US is $31k. She doesn’t need double that monthly to survive.
I’m happy for this verdict, and I’m glad it set precedent. No man should have to pay full child support for ugly children.
What the fuck are these ugly children eating?
forensic accountant Tracy Katz shared a breakdown of the family’s $240,000 monthly expenses, which claims that Christine, 49, spent an average of $18,000 per month on designer clothing, and more than $3,000 per month on beauty products and treatments.
forensic accountant claimed that the family expenses also included around $40,000 per month on gifts and flowers and nearly $9,000 drawn out at ATMs.
Needs of my children must be met!
Edit added source.
[Source](https://people.com/kevin-costner-estranged-wife-christine-spent-18k-per-month-on-designer-clothing-during-marriage-accountant-testifies-7965071)
Now they are going to have to eat generic Kraft Dinner.
Is the ugly child worth more than the good looking children, or something?
63k a month! That poor women. I wish I got a lifetime payoff for sleeping with rich people.
Can someone explain how $63,000 a month is considered “livable”? The whole point of child support is the take care of the children and that is more than a lot of people make in a while year. How is this not extortion? Are those kids buying Gucci and Prada?
Ugly kids dont get full amount?
$63k a month?!? For what?? Divorce is so fucked.
>Costner was initially ordered to pay $130k/month in child support, but upon seeing how ugly the child was he successively petitioned the court to have the payment drop to $63k.
How could someone possibly live comfortably on 63k a month? So unfair…. /s
Saw this yesterday…”Kevin Costner’s children are so used to living in luxury, it’s ‘in their DNA at this point,’ says his estranged wife’s attorney”.
I can not imagine receiving $63,000 a month.
Even for a Hollywood movie star, 63k per month is a lot of money. Even if you’re upper-class, it shouldn’t cost this much to raise children.
Oh, so the judge determined that the children weren’t that ugly? And reduced the support…. I get it now
Him! She wants the good life for not doing a thing other marrying someone. Their kids go to public school. The oldest drives a 15yr old truck. Just because he built something does not require him to pay her an outrageous amount to “want the good life” she had it and walked away.
Wife probably claimed she was borderline destitute with a ‘mere’ 130k a month.
How in the fuck is 130k a month not enough?
Hell, even with 63k a month, there’s isn’t much she CAN’T do while still providing for her children.
That’s just plain, disgusting greed just for the sake of it.
She doesn’t work…?
why should a man pay?
Child support is 63k… They both devide the value.
If one of the parents is richer, he or she should decide if they want to spoil their kids or not.
I read this as UGLY CHILD support battle.
As if the Hollywood elites fight as to whom has to care for the unattractive offspring.
Support ugly children too. It’s not their fault, it’s always the parents
She recieves more in one month, than the average American earns in a year.
I’m sure their kid is no model, but to call it ugly in a headline? That’s just mean.
I know this is a bad take but why do these guts get into marriages without good prenups or why dont they just hire escorts to get their rocks off ? These marriages are doomed from the moment they are formalised.
63k a month????? I make 30k a year…….
There isn’t a kid on earth that needs near $63,000 to live unless they have some freak medical condition. These ugly children and their greed.
But seriously child support shouldn’t be based on income with people this rich. It should be based on what’s sensible. Because I don’t believe for a second you can spend $63,000 a month on a kid unless you a misappropriating it or buying dumb things
Idk how I would get by on just $63,000 every month
Who in the fuck cant live off 63k a month…… shut the absolute fuck up.