Tuesday, February 4All That Matters

After watching every Fool Us I can, this is probably the most mind boggling one

[ad_1]

After watching every Fool Us I can, this is probably the most mind boggling one


[ad_2]

View Reddit by onus111View Source

21 Comments

  • I have children. Did I tell you I ❤️ my children. Because I love my kids. So much. If you don’t have children, fuck you, this trick is not 4u. I have 5 wizards in my home and you don’t. Youhave two? Looooser. I lie to 5 kids at once. and to wife. She not important. She birth machine. Also job. Kids inspired this trick. But none of them fuckers are as important as me. Anyways*:* *is this your card!?!*

  • Penn is close, by guessing that the magician has somehow controlled the book that is chosen.

    He didn’t control the book, but he does control the environment.

    *He* has set up two tables, rather than one – which would be the logical choice. The tables are not even close to each other, so the other person is far away enough not to notice any movement or sleight-of-hand at his table.

    *He* works at Google, where he writes code.

    *He* admits he uses technology in his magic.

    *He* chooses the book out of the books she has brought. The book he chooses notably has a best-seller sticker on the front, which heavily increases the likelihood that an ebook version of that book exists.

    *He* supplies the formula: two long words together – “two long words, long and interesting so that we can have something to play with”, because if it was two short words, e.g. “go to”, he would never be able to narrow it down.

    *He* even asks her the number of letters in each word, narrowing down the available options even further.

    *He* says the book title (picked up on his microphone). This title is heard by a partner backstage. The partner runs the program *he* has written (find a six letter word followed by a ten letter word) on the ebook, which takes less than a second. No-one needs to be a Google coder to write such a simple program. The partner tells him the phrase through his headset.

    *He* stretches out and adds drama to the trick by revealing only the first letter of the first word (“p”) before using up further time by distracting with the nonsense guess “pennywhistle”. That word is not only not either 6 or 10 letters long, but does not even appear in the book in question. Besides taking up time, it also brings back the viewers mind to his kids, and the card they had written him.

    At 4:14, we see him use an awkward hand position while picking up the marker. He is pushing the “good luck card” that his children allegedly wrote for him into a box on the table while picking up the marker.

    *He* has taken this excess time because, even though he has known both words for minutes now, he needs extra time for the person hidden underneath his table to write the text on the “good luck card” that his children allegedly wrote for him. Remember, we have only seen the back of this card, so we have no way to confirm that there is any text at all on the other side when he throws it down on the table.

    After even more time-consuming awkward banter, he finally reveals the good luck card with the first word.

    Either a) a person on a headset hidden under the table -possibly even one of his children – was given the card when he surreptitiously moved it into the box, or b) the box is a bit of technology that he made whereby the partner backstage -also possibly even one of his children – wrote on a surface and this image was transferred to the card electronically.

  • Ok, I did the coding exercise. I grabbed the full text of “Wonder” and computed a histogram of all pairs of lengths of consecutive words.

    (I spent zero effort trying to clean up the raw data: I didn’t remove section headings etc. from the raw data. But this is good enough to get a sense of the statistics.)

    The results: [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-LF2vM6skLI5aIoM_61OlOHnsRQE3y6Th-mdw1kO5aU/edit?usp=sharing](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-LF2vM6skLI5aIoM_61OlOHnsRQE3y6Th-mdw1kO5aU/edit?usp=sharing)

    There are 44 instances of a six-letter word followed by a 10-letter word in Wonder. So if you think the trick was done by a confederate running a computer analysis of the raw text, there must be some other ingredient to the trick to narrow down which of those 44 Alyson chose.

    Note also that if Alyson had chosen two consecutive 6- or 7-letter words, there would have been hundreds of possibilities Seth would have had to narrow down.

    EDIT: Here are all the possibilities for (6,10) specifically:

    always forgetting
    always understood
    anyway everything
    auggie completely
    before continuing
    better especially
    course sweetheart
    crowds everywhere
    doctor absolutely
    doesnt understand
    finish stampeding
    folded everything
    friend completely
    havent understood
    helmet everywhere
    heyday throughout
    joseph recognized
    junior counselors
    justin lastminute
    letter explaining
    lights zigzagging
    looked everywhere
    olivia pullmannot
    petosa cheerfully
    plague apparently
    played basketball
    played pictionary
    pretty straightup
    really considered
    really interested
    scared thankfully
    school auditorium
    school eventually
    school graduation
    school scholastic
    seemed especially
    single nucleotide
    spring production
    taller definitely
    theres leadership
    throat throughout
    twoday suspension
    violin everywhere

  • It’s the same old trick as all the others where text mysteriously appear.

    For example one magician opens up an orange and lo and behold, there’s a piece of paper with the word on it.

    And the solution is the same in ALL of these cases. Also the reason that in all these tricks they asks for the word before showing the paper instead of showing the paper first: it’s trick paper. the word is written on the paper remotely.

    It’s a boring trick and I am so damn tired of ALL these variants.

  • She’s wearing a wireless microphone, so it might be possible to pick up some subvocalizations from it. Or the device on the table in front of her could be imaging her throat. It seems to be positioned to get a good 3D view of it.

  • He reminds me of the world Scrabble champions that memorize words with specific character lengths. There is a Scrabble champion in French, that actually doesn’t speak the language. He just memorized the words.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *