[ad_1]
Audio in the immediate aftermath of the incident Amber Heard claims Johnny Depp beat her, raped her with a liquor bottle, then cut off his own finger while she was sleeping shows her apologizing for injuring him and not wanting to leave. Won’t be heard in court due to the presence of other voices.
[ad_2]
View Reddit by Eques9090 – View Source
FUCK OFF
Actual recording audio starts at 3:05 in the video.
About this vid, and the T-shirt; neither of them are completely (who could be under those circumstances)“innocent”, but she is clearly guilty—and in my opinion, *that’s* what the T-shirt should read.
Is there a video without the anthopomorphic eyebrows stretching it out to 13 minutes to make money?
I have a question.
At the end of each day at the court, the judge tells the jurors to not look up anything online about the case. How is that done or enforced? Do the jurors stay isolated in some hotel room with their phones and computer taken away, like in a reality TV show?
Or are they free to live their normal lives in between days, and there’s no monitoring at all?
What are the chances the jurors could for example see a video like this one?
The video would be more impactful without the guys annoying impressions, just paints the video as biased. Would have been better to let the play video play and then help describe what’s happening.
I don’t get why folks are getting so wrapped up in this. How many YouTubers and Redditors need to take a personal stance on celebrity gossip?
I obviously don’t know what happened but I heard something about her taking Ambien and I wouldn’t be surprised if she honestly doesn’t remember doing some shit.
I’ve been to a lot of parties, and have partied really hard, but the one time I took Ambien was the one time I fully blacked out, with no recollection whatsoever about a large block of time.
Yeah for whoever wants to watch the video and came to the comment section first turn down the volume at minute 3:30. There was a part of the recording where JD was shouting and nearly made me deaf cos I had my headset on medium volume.
If following this trial tought me anything, it’s that the court system is a fucking joke.
This is unwatchable.
So what’s the reasoning behind Dr. Kipper not testifying to this as clearly as he blames her in this audio recording?
Like his testimony seemed pretty lukewarm, all in all. Hardly significant in the overall case. Yet here he’s very clearly, convincingly aware she’s behind the finger accident?
who the fuck cares about some rich cunts
put your attention towards your own lives not the lives of some person you don’t even know
Down…vote…
Is this the dude who got kicked off of ScreenJunkies for being inappropriate around women co-workers?
The audio is really bad at times and it’s tough to make out if the captions are correctly representing what is being said (especially for a lot of Heard’s lines).
Has this audio been authenticated at all? Or has someone at least confirmed that the audio this is taken from is unedited and that the voices in the recording are correctly attributed? There’s been a ton of misinformation about this case, especially on Reddit/social media.
Infuriating that this can’t be played. I get that the audio isn’t top quality but still. This would crush all of her bullshit. I just want this lunatic to be caught in her lies and get what she deserves. Chick should be in jail for all the shit she’s done.
God I fucking hate youtube channels that are just people talking about a 1 minute clip and dragging it out for 20 minutes.
This was played in court. The title is misleading.
Stop upvoting what is clearly bots.
We have evidence….
Sorry, but you can’t use it..
Why?
Reasons.
Could do with just a recording and not commentary
They spelt Australia wrong.
This tape recording is explosive. Dr Kipper and the nurse are both talking in a very shocked manner about about what she did to him. I really hope the at least the judge gets to hear it unofficially
If Johnny doesn’t win after this it will be an absolute travesty
Her new PR firm has advised her to lay the shock horror vivid cruelty claims and the copious tears on with a trowel at this point so it grabs headlines and sticks in people’s minds during the 10-day trial recess. It’s totally cynical. But she’s such a shitty actress she just can’t convincingly pull it off
What does other voices have to do with it being played in court if hers and his can be identified?
It took Amber Heard to make me like Johnny Depp.
> Won’t be heard in court due to the presence of other voices
Could a lawyer explain to me why this is? I understand that hearsay is inadmissable, i.e. a person stating what they heard someone else say. But this is a direct recording. What’s the issue?